 |
Overview
Few community events are more divisive than an instance
of perceived police misconduct and a lack of adequate
governmental response, particularly when race or ethnicity
is an issue. Egregious examples such as the police chase
and beating of Los Angeles motorist Rodney King or the
shooting of Amadou Diallo in New York City are rare, but
polarizing. Swift governmental response is a necessity
to shore up police-community tensions, begin to restore
trust, and to understand what went wrong and how to avoid
it in the future. Human rights commissions have the potential
to play a central role in this response.
The Executive Session is tracing the activities of human
rights commissions in several communities dealing with
the aftermath of excessive use of force or misuse of power
by police.
Columbus, Ohio Excessive
Use of Police Force Case Study:
>
Download PDF
One of the Executive Session's first projects traces the
aftermath of the 2005 fatal shooting by police of a mentally
ill Somali man living in Columbus, Ohio. Columbus is home
to a large population of Somalis, more than 40,000, who
fled their war-torn homeland and came to the United States
as legal residents with refugee status.
In December 2005, Franklin County deputy sheriffs arrived
at the residence of 23-year old Nasir Abdi, pursuant to
a court order, to escort him to a psychiatric hospital
where he was to receive medications. The deputies, fearing
Abdi was drawing a knife, shot and killed him. Following
the shooting, hundreds of members of the Somali community
protested at City Hall, outraged that non-lethal means
were not used to handle the situation.
The Columbus Community Relations Commission responded
by implementing a protocol it devised to intervene when
police conduct leads to community unrest and protest.
The approach employs swift formation of a Community Intervention
Team (CIT), made up of community members selected by representatives
of the aggrieved group or community. The CIT then meets
with representatives of the police agencies involved.
The end goal is to restore trust between the community
and police that was breached by the particular event.
In this case, leaders of the local Somali community appointed
to the CIT met with representatives of the Sheriff's Department,
FBI, Ohio Highway Patrol, Ohio Homeland Security Office
and police chiefs from area townships that have large
Somali populations. The Commission facilitated the meetings.
Early on, discussions shifted away from specifics of the
death of Mr. Abdi because his family filed a wrongful
death lawsuit against the Sheriff's Department. The conversations
became more general, examining persistent misunderstandings
between law enforcement and the Somali community. The
CIT format provided a forum to promote understanding about
law enforcement tactics among Somalis and about Somali
culture among police personnel
The CIT process culminated in a formal, signed agreement
between representatives of the Somali and law enforcement
communities, to be monitored by the Commission. The case
study examines how the Commission facilitated community
healing, how it will encourage further reform, and how
it will measure the effectiveness of the responses to
the incident overall.
New Orleans Excessive Use
of Force Case Study:
A second case study focuses on the response led by the
New Orleans Human Relations Commission to complaints about
police treatment of young black men that surfaced following
the December 2004 death of Levon Jones. Mr. Jones was
an African American college student killed on New Years
Eve by Bourbon Street bouncers using physical restraints.
The Human Relations Commission held public hearings and
conducted a "secret shopper" investigation that documented
pervasive discrimination against African American males
by businesses along Bourbon Street. Community complaints
about the bouncers were accompanied by equally strong
complaints about police treatment of young black men in
the area. To confront these problems, the Commission sponsored
training for more than 850 bartenders and bouncers, in
partnership with local police and the U.S. Department
of Justice.
Just as progress was being made on community-merchant-police
relations, New Orleans was ravaged by Hurricane Katrina,
interrupting efforts to press forward. Interested in creating
a police review mechanism but now faced with strict budgetary
limitations, the City of New Orleans in 2006 announced
creation of a volunteer community police oversight group.
The case study examines the pros and cons of the model
and explores whether the community perceptions about the
treatment of young black men by police improved, both
before Katrina hit and since.
Greensboro, North Carolina
Police Complaints Review:
Currently in Greensboro, it is
the responsibility of the Police Department's Internal
Affairs Bureau to investigate citizen complaints over
police conduct. A committee of the Human Rights Commission
serves as an appeals body for citizens who are dissatisfied
with the results of an Internal Affairs finding. Despite
commitment by commissioners serving on the committee,
the model is not viewed as strong. City leaders suspect
that many citizens are reluctant to file complaints due
to a lack of confidence in the overall system. This project
involves members of the Executive Session with city officials,
the police department, the Human Relations Department
and Commission, and Greensboro citizens to develop a police
complaint review model that the public, particularly African
American citizens, will view as credible.
Various factors contribute to the current distrust, including
sloppy record keeping of complaints filed, limited public
awareness of the process and a perception that the Commission,
which has no subpoena power, lacks teeth to adequately
review Internal Affairs findings. Another factor is persistent
racial tension between citizens and police in Greensboro.
The most recent example culminated in the resignation
of the city's white police chief after it was found he
had a secret unit conducting surveillance of African American
police officers. It was later discovered he had secretly
tape recorded meetings between police personnel and predominantly
African American civic leaders.
Despite what appears to be a grim situation, city officials
are committed to developing a police review model that
responds to the criticisms and is capable of gaining public
trust. City officials readily acknowledge that the City's
response to the former police chief's activities, including
development of a credible police review mechanism, is
critical to the future of race relations in Greensboro.
This project will begin with a case study providing background
on the current situation. The Executive Session will also
work to facilitate conversations that lead to the development
of a new police complaint review procedure.
|
 |
 |